Barrera v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHAVEZ, Justice.
In this consolidated appeal, Noe Barrera appeals from convictions for telephone harassment 1 and bail jumping. 2 Both cases were tried without a jury. In three points of error, appellant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel, he was denied due process because the trial court conducted a single punishment hearing for the two offenses, and that the evidence was insufficient to support the bail jumping conviction. We affirm.
The right to counsel is the right to reasonably effective assistance of counsel. Strickland, v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In the Matter of A.A.B.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
- James Alan Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Kendric Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- Eve Greener v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.