Legal Opinion
Clark v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided February 15, 1984No. 077-83PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.
Appeal is taken from convictions in two cases in which the appellant was charged with violating the Polygraph Examiners Act, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. Art. 4413(29cc). 1 After finding the appellant guilty, the court assessed a fine of $100.00 in each case, probated for six months. The Houston Court of Appeals (1st District) affirmed the convictions in an unpublished opinion. We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review in order to review the Court of Appeals’ holdings that the evidence is sufficient to sustain…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Eastep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Quintana v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.