Legal Opinion

Wright v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 21, 1990No. 552-89CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

The plaintiff instituted this action pro se, seeking military back pay and other relief arising from personnel actions that occurred while plaintiff was a member of the Mississippi Air National Guard. The case is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, RUSCC 12(b)(1). For the reasons discussed herein, the defendant’s motion is granted and the plaintiff’s complaint is to be dismissed.

Facts

The plaintiff, George W. Wright, enlisted in the Mississippi Air National Guard (ANG) and was assigned to the 238th Flight Facilities…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Richardson v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Kirby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  5. Maryland Ex Rel. Levin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McLain Plumbing & Electrical Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Osborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. D'Andrea v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  4. Yount v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Walker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API