Legal Opinion

Central R. v. Paslick

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 23, 1917No. 65PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Action by Joseph Paslick against the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, Circuit Judge.

Paslick sued in reliance on the federal Employers’ Liability Act; and the only question, here presented is whether he received the injuries for which action is brought at a time *714when he was engaged in the defendant in error’s share of interstate commerce. Pedersen v. Railway, 229 U. S. 146, 33 Sup. Ct. 648, 57 L. Ed. 1125, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 153; North Carolina R. R. Co. v. Zachary, 232 U. S. 248, 58 L. Ed. 591, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 159.1 That he was a servant of the railroad company is admitted. Plaintiff below was a helper in the blacksmith' shop appurtenant to and part of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. v. BusseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  2. Schauffele v. Director General of RailroadsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
  3. Louisville N. R. Co. v. PettisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Kepner v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. Sanders v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API