Kepner v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1DissentWalker, J.
(dissenting) : — I do not concur in the reasons adduced or the conclusion reached, in the majority opinion.
The correctness, in the main, of the statement of the case made by my learned associate, I do not question. I do not, however, deem it inappropriate to state the facts, as I read this record, prefatory to a discussion of the applicable law.
The plaintiff, at the time of his injury, had for five years been employed as a switchman by the defendant. When the accident occurred, which resulted in the loss of one of the plaintiff’s legs, he was working for defendant in the yards of its repair…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.