Klein Et Ux. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued in trespass to recover damages for alleged injuries to the wife, sustained in a fall on March 23, 1927, in defendant’s store in the City of McKeesport. After verdict rendered for plaintiffs, the trial judge refused defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto, but granted a new trial. Defendant appealed.
The alleged negligence on the part of defendant was in washing and oiling the floor of one of the aisles of the storeroom without “powdering” the oiled space to render it reasonably safe for prospective customers. This condition was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Cubitt v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Spickernagle v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Gorman v. Simon Brahm's Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Talarico v. Baker Office Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Ralston v. MerrittSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Strout v. American Stores Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Brandis v. Empire State Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- In Re: Order Amending Rules 803(6), 803(8) and 803(10) Approving the Revision of the Comments to Rules 802, 803(7) and 803(9), and Adopting New Rule 902(13) of the Pennsylvania Rules of EvidenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.