Legal Opinion

Talarico v. Baker Office Furniture Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1929No. Appeal, 152PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This case is before us on a motion for judgment non obstante veredicto alone. We adopt the following excerpts from the opinion of the court below refusing to enter such judgment:

“At about 10:30 p. m. on March 1, 1927, plaintiff’s husband, a street sweeper employed by the City of Pittsburgh, while engaged at his work......, was struck by a truck owned by defendant and bearing its trade name. Defendant admitted formally that the driver of the truck was its employee and that he was negligent in operation of [the] car, but it contended that he had abandoned its business shortly after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartig v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Readshaw Et Ux. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Miller v. Service and Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Capozi v. Hearst Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Sefton v. Valley Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Davis v. UnderdahlOregon Supreme Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API