Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Martinez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1964No. 37611PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonald, judge.

Petitioner, an inmate of the state penitentiary, brings this application for writ ■of habeas corpus in his own handwriting. When petitioner’s conviction reached this Court on appeal, the writer shared the view •of the majority and affirmed the case, from which position he has not departed. It is my view that the Juvenile Act and all hearings thereunder are civil and not criminal in nature. It necessarily follows that I do not believe that jeopardy attaches in juvenile courts as they are without jurisdiction of felony offenses.

My views are fully set forth in the •opinion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hultin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  2. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  4. Ex Parte SawyerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hegwood v. KindrickDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1967
  2. Mike L. Martinez v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Ex Parte MartinezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Ex Parte SawyerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Ex Parte SawyerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API