Legal Opinion

Mike L. Martinez v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 16, 1968No. 25205_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. The facts and circumstances herein are fully reported in Martinez v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 443, 350 S.W.2d 929 (1961) and Ex parte Martinez, 386 S.W.2d 280 (Tex.Cr.App. 1964). Hence, they are not repeated here.

The Judgment of the District Court was entered prior to the decision of this Court in Huitín v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 396 F.2d 216 [May 30, 1968]. While there are distinctions between this case and Huitín, the rationale there adopted requires us to hold here that Texas’ treatment of Martinez was a denial of that fundamental fairness…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Howard E. Hultin v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Ex Parte MartinezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Mason v. HendersonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
  3. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API