Legal Opinion
State v. Lajoie
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1993No. CC 10-88-08977; CA A63706; SC S37935PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*65GILLETTE, J.
At issue in this case is whether an accused’s failure to give statutorily mandated notice of his intention to offer evidence of the alleged victim’s past sexual behavior requires a trial court to refuse to allow the accused to present such evidence at trial and, if it does, whether such a requirement is constitutional. Under the specific facts presented here, we hold that such a failure does so require and that the requirement is constitutional.
Defendant was charged with rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375, sodomy in the first degree, ORS 163.405, and sexual abuse in the first…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Clinton K. Lajoie v. S. Frank Thompson, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, No. 98-35919Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- State v. BeelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. IversonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. WeaverOregon Supreme Court · 2020
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.