Legal Opinion
Pearlson v. Does 1 to 4646
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 6, 1999No. B130931PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
Gary H. Pearlson, in propria persona, filed this appeal after the superior court dismissed his complaint. We affirm the judgment (order of dismissal).
Factual and Procedural Background
This is the second occasion we have had to revisit the viability of this action. As we explained in a prior opinion (Pearlson v. Does 1 to 646 (July 24, 1998) B114452 [nonpub. opn.]), “This action was initiated by the filing of a verified complaint on November 22, 1996. Appellant Gary H. Pearlson in propria persona, is the plaintiff, and named as defendants were Does 1 through 646. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Moyal v. LanphearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Lyons v. WickhorstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Fannin Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Traweek v. Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Myerson & CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pierce v. San Mateo County Sheriff's DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- PROGRESSIVE CONCRETE, INC. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006