Legal Opinion
Traweek v. Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Myerson & Casey
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1991No. Docket Nos. D012714, D012728PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, Acting P. J.
—In the wake of an unsuccessful defense of a civil suit (see Ballou v. Master Properties No. 6 (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 65 [234 Cal.Rptr. 264]) and other matters, plaintiff Richard W. Traweek and related entities (collectively Traweek) filed two malpractice lawsuits against his former attorneys and accountants. In the first (the Jacke matter), Traweek sued the law firm of Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Myerson & Casey (Finley Kumble), Richard Williams (a Finley Kumble partner) and H. Clay Jacke, an attorney “associated as counsel” for Traweek with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Moyal v. LanphearCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Bernard W. Piel, D/B/A Elliot Tool and Manufacturing Company v. Harvard Interiors Manufacturing Company, a Division of Harvard Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Kaye v. Mount La Jolla Homeowners Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Rim Forest Lumber Co. v. Woodside Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carlson v. STATE DEPT. OF FISH AND GAMECalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Pearlson v. Does 1 to 4646California Court of Appeal · 1999
- L. Tyson v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024