Legal Opinion

Travelers Insurance v. O'Hara

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 12, 2002No. 02-77PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This case requires us to determine whether or not a workers’ compensation insurance carrier may pursue its subrogation rights against a third-party tortfeasor when the tortfeasor and the injured party have reached a settlement. The injured worker in this case, John O’Hara, suffered a work-related hernia, and underwent surgery to repair the hernia in March of 1993. During surgery, Dr. Emilio Tirado allegedly placed a stitch that injured O’Hara’s femoral nerve, causing him a great deal of pain and difficulty in walking. O’Hara and his wife filed a medical malpractice action…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shelter Mutual Insurance v. BoughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Franklin v. Healthsource of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Wood Et AlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Welch Foods, Inc. v. Chicago Title InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Travelers Insurance Co. v. McCluskeySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. TACC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. Carroll Deal v. Fremont IndemnityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. Jason Caldwell v. Tacc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API