Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. TACC Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 2, 2005No. Nos. 04-2090, 04-3404PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

Fremont Indemnity Company (“Fremont”) and the Arkansas Property and Casualty Guaranty Fund (the “Fund”) appeal two separate decisions of the district court.1 In two separate orders, the district court concluded that because Carroll Deal and Karen Lamb Kirkham were not “made whole” by their respective settlements with TACC Corporation and Illinois Tool Works, Inc., Fremont and the Fund did not have a right of subrogation with respect to the settlement proceeds. We affirm the decisions of the district court.

1. BACKGROUND

Jason Caldwell, Carroll Deal and David Lamb were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. R.W. Murray Co. v. Shatterproof Glass Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  3. Shelter Mutual Insurance v. BoughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Schueck v. BurrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Bean v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Zyprexa Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
  2. Jason Caldwell v. Tacc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API