Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Cummings

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 1978No. 77-658PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (plaintiff) filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against defendants Bruce Cummings and Nicholas Jason for a declaration that Cummings’ policy issued by plaintiff on Cummings’ private automobile did not provide uninsured motorist coverage for defendants, who were police officers injured by an uninsured motorist while they were on duty riding in a Chicago police car. On cross motions for summary judgment, the circuit court entered judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal, arguing that (1) the Cummings’ policy should afford coverage under its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ullman v. Wolverine InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Horne v. Superior Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  3. Travelers Insurance v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Brunmeier v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Eastman v. MessnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Taylor v. Pekin InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Woodward v. Pratt, Bradford & Tobin, P.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Terry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Vidmar v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API