Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Pekin Insurance

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2008No. 105158PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Thomas, Kilbride, Garman, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

This case involves the application of section 5(b) of the Workers’ Compensation Act (820 ILCS 305/5(b) (West 2006)), which grants an employer a lien on an employee’s recovery against a third-party tortfeasor, up to the amount of the workers’ compensation benefits paid to the employee. The second paragraph of section 5(b) requires the employer to pay the employee’s attorney an attorney fee totaling 25% of the amount of the lien recovered by the employer. At issue…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Estate of DierkesIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Ullman v. Wolverine InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Hoglund v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. J. L. Simmons Co. Ex Rel. Hartford Insurance Group v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fednav International Ltd. v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Monson v. City of DanvilleIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Rexam Beverage Can Co. v. BolgerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Sardiga v. Northern Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. People ex rel. Illinois Department of Corrections v. HawkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API