Legal Opinion

People v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1884PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the late District Court of the nineteenth Judicial District. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.

Channel Street, between Fourth and Fifth Streets, in the city and county of San Francisco, is two hundred feet wide, covered by the waters of the bay of San Francisco, and navigable by vessels engaged in commerce. On the north side of this portion of the street the defendant, in the *499year 1873, constructed a wharf, which lie afterwards, on September Í2, 1876, sold and conveyed to the plaintiff, by the following description: “ All that wharf structure in the city and county of San Francisco situate on the north side of Channel Street, between Fourth and Fifth Streets, adjacent to and in front…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of San Francisco v. CanavanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Winans v. ChristyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Holladay v. FrisbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Guy v. HermanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. California Fish Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Berkeley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. KerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API