People v. McHarris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*825We find unpersuasive the defendant’s contention that the alleged improper remarks made by the prosecutor during summation require reversal. The arguments concerning most of the remarks were not preserved for appellate review because the defendant either failed to object to the prosecutor’s statements, made only a general objection, failed to request curative instructions, or moved only belatedly for a mistrial (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Balls, 69 NY2d 641, 642; People v Dien, 77 NY2d 885, 886; People v Medina, 53 NY2d 951, 952; People v Morris, 148 AD2d 552, 553). In any event, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. GallowayNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. MedinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. DienNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- People v. SalnaveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. MalaveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. PersaudAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. SheltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.