Legal Opinion

People v. Dien

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1991PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant’s sole argument on appeal is that a specific comment made by the prosecutor during summation violated his rights to a fair trial by an impartial jury and to equal protection under the law. At the time of the prosecutor’s statement, however, defendant made only a general objection, thus failing to preserve his argument for this Court’s review (see, People v Rivera, 73 NY2d 941, 942; People v Ford, 69 NY2d 775, 776).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. People v. TongeNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. McHarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. People v. GarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. GallowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API