Legal Opinion

Horton v. Haralson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 29, 1912No. 19,168PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Acadia; William Campbell, Judge. Action by H. M. Horton against Mrs. E. F. Haralson and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.

Plaintiff, assignee of a number of claims due by the “Estate of E. Barousse,” a commercial partnership, brought this suit against Mrs. Eugenie Florence Hayes, widow of Edgar Barousse, deceased, now wife of Fred W. Haralson, against Mrs. Joseph Barousse, wife of Edward Daigle, as well as against Edward Daigle, husband in community of the said Eva Barousse, alleged of the firm known by the name of “Estate of E. Barousse,” to recover a sum of about $20,000 made up of different accounts of a number of merchants who had sold merchandise to the firm — that is, they are all sued as partners except…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CuculluSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. A. Lehmann & Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  3. Blaffer v. Louisiana National BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ritchie Grocer Co. v. DeanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Frierson Co. v. MurrayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Holmes Co. v. HillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Monroe Grocer Co. v. BarronLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API