Legal Opinion

A. Lehmann & Co. v. Rivers

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 16, 1903No. 14,285PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; George H. Théard, Judge. Action by 'A. Lehmann & Co. against Robert E. Rivers. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, J.

Plaintiffs seek in this action to make an amount subject to their claim for which a judgment had been pronounced in ease of Robert E. Rivers v. Oak Lawn Sugar Company.

In due time, before the suit brought by A. Lehmann & Co. against Robert E. Rivers in the case here was filed, a writ of attachment was issued. This was on the 13th day of February, 1900. It was posted on the same day.

Robert E. Rivers was an absentee. A curator ad hoc was appointed to represent him, and on the 6th day of February, 1900, he was served with citation and copies.

In June, 1900, Rivers was, it is alleged by defendant,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nugent v. McCaffreySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  2. Mutual National Bank v. MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  3. Ealer v. McAllister & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
  4. Citizens Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Horton v. HaralsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
  2. Whitney Cent. Trust & Savings Bank v. NortonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API