State v. Wilkerson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
By the WHOLE COURT.
ST. PAUL, J.
The defendant was charged with having “in his possession for sale intoxicating liquors for beverage purposes” ; it was further charged that he had once before been convicted of “having intoxicating liquor in his possession.”
Thereupon he was found guilty, and sentenced as for a second offense.
I
Defendant moved to quash the charge; but, as the motion was based on the face thereof, we will, for convenience, treat it as if made in arrest of judgment, and postpone consideration thereof for the present.
II
The defendant complains that, having excepted to the admission of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. NejinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Brittian v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- State v. BlassengameSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- State v. CompagnoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Horton v. HaralsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RowellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- State v. GremillionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- State v. PridgenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- State v. ShropulasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940