Baker v. Floto
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PAULSEN, J. pro tem. *
Respondent commenced this action alleging that he and appellant orally entered into a partnership agreement to conduct a horse-racing stable and to train and race horses at recognized tracks; that the parties agreed to share equally in the profits and losses and equally to contribute capital and advances to the partnership; that respondent had contributed more capital and made more advances than appellant. He asked for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting. Appellant denied the existence of a partnership and by way of a separate defense alleged that he had…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Estate of GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Dankert v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Caviglia v. JarvisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955