Legal Opinion

Baker v. Floto

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 18, 1954No. Civ. 8329PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULSEN, J. pro tem. *

Respondent commenced this action alleging that he and appellant orally entered into a partnership agreement to conduct a horse-racing stable and to train and race horses at recognized tracks; that the parties agreed to share equally in the profits and losses and equally to contribute capital and advances to the partnership; that respondent had contributed more capital and made more advances than appellant. He asked for a dissolution of the partnership and an accounting. Appellant denied the existence of a partnership and by way of a separate defense alleged that he had…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Estate of GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Dankert v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Caviglia v. JarvisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API