Legal Opinion

State v. Murrell

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 15, 1986No. 2729PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103 (a), larceny in the fifth degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-125a (a), and criminal mischief in the third degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-117 (a) (1) (A). The sole issue in this appeal involves the admission into evidence during the state’s case-in-chief of the defendant’s prior miscon*77duct as substantive proof of identity and a common scheme to commit the charged offenses. We find no reversible error.

The jury…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. State v. BramanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. State v. HauckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. MooneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. State v. SawyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. State v. MerriamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API