Legal Opinion

Aceto Chemical Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided September 21, 1972No. 5431, C.A.D. 1069PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lane, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the Customs Court, 65 Cust. Ct. 135, C.D. 4066 (1970), rendered on a rehearing of the case for all purposes including the taking of further testimony,1 overruling appellant’s protest of the customs collector’s classification of the imported chemical material invoiced as “Empicol TSL” (hereinafter Empicol). The material was classified as a triethanolamine salt and assessed with duty at the rate of 3 cents per pound plus 15 per centum ad valorem, and appellant claimed the correct classification to be either as a cleaning liquid not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Aceto Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Aceto Chemical Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tomoegawa USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  2. E.M. Chemicals v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  3. Avecia, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  5. Berns & Koppstein v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API