Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 24, 1937No. 18840PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of property over the value of fifty dollars, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

Appellant’s main contention is that the testimony in this case is insufficient to sustain his conviction for the offense of theft; that if he is guilty of any offense, it is swindling and not theft by false pretext. In order that this opinion may more clearly reflect the reasons for our conclusions hereinafter announced, we deem it proper to set forth the salient facts proven upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sherman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Deblanc v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. De Blanc v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Contreras v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  2. Bomar v. Insurors Indemnity & InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Dix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Dix v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API