Legal Opinion
Wienco, Inc. v. Katahn Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 25, 1992No. 91-3600PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge.
After years of “consistent, wilful and recalcitrant” failure by Wienco and Robert Wien (“the Wien parties”) to meet the court’s deadlines, the district judge refused to give them any additional post-hoc extensions of time. (Judge Holderman’s Statement of Reasons Pursuant to Rule 50 For Granting Katahn’s Motion For Summary Judgment, March 12, 1992). The district court explained that its patience had run out “with the stalling, delaying, and non-responsive approach of the Wienco parties with regard to this litigation.” (Judge Holderman’s Order Granting Summary Judgment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hibernia National Bank v. Administracion Central Sociedad Anonima, Jorge Raoul Garcia Granados De GarayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- C.K.S. Engineers, Inc. v. White Mountain Gypsum Company, M.S. Riddle and Eryl A. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Stewart v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Nellie BRASIC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HEINEMANN’S INC., Bakeries, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Johnson v. GudmundssonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Johnson v. GudmundssonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Stewart v. McginnisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.