Legal Opinion
Walkup v. Santander Bank, N.A.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 3, 2015No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-3929PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Richard L. Walkup and Jean G. Walkup here present a novel legal theory for recovery against the bank and''mortgage sub-servicer that denied their repeated applications for a mortgage loan modification under the federal Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”). They do not claim that they were improperly denied a modification. Rather, they allege that Defendants Santander Bank, N.A. (“Santander”) and PHH Mortgage Corporation (“PHH”) knew that Plaintiffs would not qualify for a loan modification, but nonetheless engaged in deceptive…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Yenchi, E. v. Ameriprise Financial, Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Singleton v. Jas Auto. LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Abdul Shabazz v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Rightpath ServicingDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- Almashhadani v. NORRIS MCLAUGHLIN, P.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.