Gutner v. Switzerland General Ins. Co. of Zurich
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Since the trial court found unworthy of belief the evidence tending to show that the binder sued upon was not written according to the plaintiffs’ application, we need concern ourselves no further with the plaintiffs’ claim on argument concerning the effect of such evidence. Without this, it would be well to bear in mind that the plaintiffs have seen lit to bring this suit at law to enforce the terms of the binder as written, rather than to take any appropriate measures to have the writing reformed.
Accordingly, the outcome of this appeal depends upon the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thomas v. Builders' Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Sweeting v. Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
3Cited by11 opinions
- Oregon Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. v. ClamorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Air Transport Manufacturing Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Springfield Dyeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Michigan Alkali Co. v. Bankers Indemnity Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.