In the Interest of W.D.H.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MAJORITY OPINION
YATES, Justice.
Appellant, William Hightower, appeals the termination of the parent-child relationship with his son, W.D.H, III. On appeal, Hightower argues the trial court erred in not applying the standard for the termination of his parental rights as found in the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, 25 U.S.C. § 1901, et seq. (1983) (“ICWA”). We agree. Because the trial court did not apply the correct legal standard for the termination of the parent-child relationship, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for further proceedings.
I. Background
W.D.H. was…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. HealTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Railroad Com'n of Texas v. Lone Star Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Comm'n of Kan.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.