Legal Opinion

State v. Heal

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1996No. 94-1187PublishedCited by 295 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Enoch

Justice ABBOTT not sitting.

The motions for rehearing are overruled. Our opinion of November 2, 1995, is withdrawn and the following is substituted in its place.

This is a condemnation case. The issue presented is whether the Heals are entitled to severance damages for the diminution in the value of the remainder of their property resulting from the widening of Southwestern Boulevard in conjunction with the North Central Expressway expansion project in the City of Dallas. Because the Heals are precluded from recovering compensation for any diminution not directly related to the taking of their…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Matter of HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Westgate, Ltd. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Burnett v. MotykaTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by295 opinions

  1. Quick v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Interstate Northborough Partnership v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Tarrant Regional Water District v. GraggTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Texas Department of Public Safety v. AlfordTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Texas Department of Public Safety v. J.H.J., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008

290 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API