Legal Opinion

Drammeh v. Uber Technologies Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided August 18, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00202Unknown

1Opinion

1 The Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 DRAMMEH, ET AL., 9 Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 2:21-cv-202-BJR 10 v. 11 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE OR SEVER THIRD- 12 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC., ET AL., PARTY COMPLAINT; DENYING MOTION FOR STAY; GRANTING MOTION FOR 13 Defendants. PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION 17 Plaintiffs Amie Drammeh and Yusuoha Ceesay, representing the estate of Cherno Ceesay 18 19 (“Cherno”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this lawsuit against defendants…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Southwest Administrators, Inc. v. Rozay's Transfer, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Wagenblast v. Odessa School District No. 105-157-166JWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Manning v. LoidhamerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  5. Central Washington Refrigeration, Inc. v. BarbeeWashington Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API