Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Bush

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 24, 1960PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLIKEN, Judge.

The issue here is whether the railroad increased the flow of surface water across the land of appellee.

The appellee, Mary Elizabeth Bush, is the owner of low land adjacent to a fill or embankment on which the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company (hereinafter referred to as the Company) has its tracks. The land on the other side of the railroad fill is higher and would drain normally across the Bush land into Poor Fork of the Cumberland River, if it were not prevented from doing so by the railroad fill. A stone culvert, cut through the fill at the time the railroad was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wallace v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  2. Jarvis v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  3. Rutherford v. Louisville & Nashville R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. CundiffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  3. Klutey v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  4. Klutey v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API