Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Louisville & Nashville R.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 30, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Commissioner.

The four plaintiff appellants sued the Louisville & Nashville Railroad and one Bassham for damages caused by water overflowing their lands after passing through a drainage ditch constructed by the latter. The trial court directed a verdict for both of the defendants, on the ground that the ditch was in existence prior to the time plaintiffs purchased their properties.

*1018Near Shields, Kentucky, the railroad right of way traverses Bassham’s property, and parallels a branch of the Cumberland River. Natural drainage flows from the upper side of the right of way down through his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pickerill v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Dugan v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Stone v. AshurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. Gott v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Klutey v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. BushCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1960
  4. Klutey v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  5. Klutey v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API