Legal Opinion

In Re Property Seized From Becker

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 3, 1981No. Magistrate 80-2051-M-01PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court upon petitioner’s motion for the return of seized property and the suppression of evidence. In support of this motion, petitioner contends that the property was seized against his will, that certain of the items seized were not authorized by the search warrant, that the search warrant did not specifically describe the location of the search, and that the officers participating in the search were without jurisdiction. In his supporting brief, petitioner further alleges that the affidavit in support of the application…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. Charles Lidge Bolts and Joe Dee HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. William Bruce HareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GallowaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Winters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. United States v. WaxmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. United States v. FosterDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API