Legal Opinion
United States v. Waxman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 4, 1983No. Crim. 83-101PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DITTER, District Judge.
In this criminal matter, defendant has moved to suppress his statement given to law enforcement officers and 172 art objects seized from his residence during the execution of a search warrant and subsequent occupation order. 1 At an evidentiary hearing on the motion, 10 witnesses testified. In addition, counsel have submitted numerous exhibits and lengthy memoranda. After careful consideration of the evidence and the arguments of counsel, I conclude defendant’s motion must be granted in part and denied in part for the reasons which follow.
Background
On April 2,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Cielo Marin-Buitrago, Tomas William MoralesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- State v. EvansNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. CameronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- General Electric Co. v. SpeicherDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- United States v. Genell HareCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.