Legal Opinion

United States v. Foster

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 15, 1995No. CR-95-5-SPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO SUPPRESS

SEAY, Chief Judge.

The defendant, Albert Foster, Jr., is charged in a twelve-count superseding indictment with various violations of Titles 18 and 21 of the United States Code related to controlled substances, firearms, false identification, sexual exploitation of minors, and transportation of a minor. Before the court for its consideration is Foster’s amended motion to suppress. Foster contends that all evidence seized from his residence on December 16, 1994, should be suppressed because the underlying state court search warrant was not obtained in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. United States v. Leigh Raymond TamuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Arvle Edgar MedlinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API