Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Jasmine Vineyards, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1980No. Civ. 3670Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BROWN (G. A.), P. J., Concurring and Dissenting.

I agree that the evidence is sufficient to support the Board’s conclusions regarding the unfair labor practices.

I concur in the result reached by the principal opinion with regard to ■the remedies imposed by paragraphs 1 (cease and desist order), 2(a) (expanded access), 2(b) (supplying payroll lists), 2(c) (posting notices), 2(d) (mailing copies of notice), and 2(f) (notification of steps taken to comply) of the revised order, with the qualifications set forth below.

*984I concur with paragraph 2(e) of the remedial order insofar as it requires a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Tex-Cal Land Management, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. J. R. Norton Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Bush Hog, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Texas Electric Cooperatives, Inc., Treating DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API