Legal Opinion
Skourtes v. City of Tigard
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 24, 1968PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
Plaintiffs seek a decree declaring void a purported annexation by the City of Tigard. Defendant city appeals from a decree in favor of plaintiffs.
The trial court held that the annexation proceedings were invalid for failure to comply with ORS 222.170 under which the purported annexation proceedings were brought.
The pertinent part of ORS 222.170 provides as follows:
“(1) The legislative body of the city need not call or hold an election in any contiguous territory proposed to be annexed, or post notice in the contiguous territory, if at least two-thirds of the landowners who also own at least…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lantz v. CarawayIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Chan v. City of South OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- City of Corpus Christi v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
3Cited by4 opinions
- Griffin v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Peterson v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Johnson v. City of La GrandeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Morsman v. City of MadrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004