Oswald MacH. Co. v. Farnsworth Ebert
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit for a breach of contract against John Farnsworth and Carl Ebert, as former partners trading under the name of John Farnsworth Associated.
It appears from the evidence that a written contract was eiitered into on February 14, 1925, whereby the plaintiff was to manufacture punches, dies, tools, fixtures and 20,000 locks used in printing presses. The plaintiff received $1,288.33 on account, $1,090 of which was paid for the dies, etc., and the remaining sum for the locks, which, admittedly, were delivered before the contract was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- William Zoller Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Kirk v. Hartman & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Hall v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Lowenstein v. GreenbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Bing v. SchmittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lazarus v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- H. Daroff & Sons, Inc. v. VitulloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- O'Brien & Gere Engineers, Inc. v. TaleghaniDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Huron v. SchomakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Pinkerton's National Detective Agency v. Rosedale Silk Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.