Legal Opinion

Oswald MacH. Co. v. Farnsworth Ebert

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1930No. Appeal 282PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

The plaintiff brought this action in assumpsit for a breach of contract against John Farnsworth and Carl Ebert, as former partners trading under the name of John Farnsworth Associated.

It appears from the evidence that a written contract was eiitered into on February 14, 1925, whereby the plaintiff was to manufacture punches, dies, tools, fixtures and 20,000 locks used in printing presses. The plaintiff received $1,288.33 on account, $1,090 of which was paid for the dies, etc., and the remaining sum for the locks, which, admittedly, were delivered before the contract was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. William Zoller Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Kirk v. Hartman & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  3. Hall v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Lowenstein v. GreenbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Bing v. SchmittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lazarus v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. H. Daroff & Sons, Inc. v. VitulloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. O'Brien & Gere Engineers, Inc. v. TaleghaniDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Huron v. SchomakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Pinkerton's National Detective Agency v. Rosedale Silk Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API