Legal Opinion

United States v. Keith Dozier, Also Known as Pete, Also Known as Keith Bashir. Keith Dozier

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 18, 1997No. 96-5785PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

119 F.3d 239

UNITED STATES of America

v.

Keith DOZIER, also known as Pete, also known as Keith Bashir.

Keith Dozier, Appellant.

No. 96-5785.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Argued June 17, 1997.

Decided July 18, 1997.

Faith S. Hochberg, United States Attorney, Kevin McNulty, Allan Tananbaum (argued), Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Newark, NJ, for Appellee.

Patrick A. Mullin (argued), Hackensack, NJ, for Appellant.

Before: STAPLETON, LEWIS and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

STAPLETON, Circuit Judge.

1

In this case we must determine whether the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. United States v. George Retos, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. Kevin Davis, at No. 02-4521 Kevin A. Minnis, at No. 03-1130 Reginal Scott, at No. 03-1160Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. Curtis EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Dwayne StevensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Joseph B. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API