Rystrom v. Sutter Butte Canal Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
Action by plaintiff to recover damages for loss of crops due to the alleged failure of defendant to furnish water for irrigation purposes during the years 1921 and 1922. Plaintiff had judgment, and the defendant’s motion for a new trial being denied, the defendant appeals from the order and judgment entered in said action. It appears from the transcript that the defendant was under contract to furnish the plaintiff for irrigation purposes during the years mentioned 1.33 cubic feet per second of water for the use of plaintiff in the growing of rice. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- O'Neill v. Thomas Day Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Tousley v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Emerson v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- O'Neill v. Union Assurance Soc'y, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1913