Wright v. Bristol Patent Leather Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 68, Jan. T., 1917, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1914, No. 2391, entered for plaintiff on the record in case of Lucy W. Wright v. Bristol Patent Leather Company, a Corporation. Assumpsit to recover balance due upon contracts for sale of a secret formula to prepare patent leather.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 68, Jan. T., 1917, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., Dec. T., 1914, No. 2391, entered for plaintiff on the record in case of Lucy W. Wright v. Bristol Patent Leather Company, a Corporation. Assumpsit to recover balance due upon contracts for sale of a secret formula to prepare patent leather. The facts appear in the following opinion by Rodgers, J.: This is an action in assumpsit to recover the balance due upon five installment payments on the total sum of five thousand dollars, under a contract for the absolute sale of the use of a certain secret…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court below directing it to be entered.
2Cited by25 opinions
- LJL Transportation, Inc. v. Pilot Air Freight Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Accu-Weather, Inc. v. Prospect Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Keystone Dedicated Logistics, Inc. v. JGB Enterprises, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- International Diamond Importers, Ltd. v. Singularity Clark, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.