Legal Opinion

Evans v. Duke

California Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1903No. S.F. No. 2193PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

On August 3, 1893, the plaintiffs and defendant entered into a contract, in writing, whereby the plaintiffs agreed to sell, and the defendant to buy, certain real estate and some personal property situated thereon for the sum of $12,555. Of this sum the defendant paid, upon February 15, 1894, the amount of $6,310, with interest at nine per cent from the date of the contract. The rest was to be paid in three annual installments, falling due upon the first day of January in each of the years 1895, 1896, and 1897. Defendant having made default in his payments, on February 5, 1898, this action…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hart v. ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Ruhl v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Cross v. MayoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Caples v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Payne v. BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Ferguson v. EdgarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API