Legal Opinion

Barclays American/Business Credit, Inc. v. Otterstrom

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided November 10, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-291-JRRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROTH, District Judge.

The plaintiff in this case, Barclays American/Business Credit, Inc. (Barclays), is the assignee of an Investor Note, executed by the defendant Jan Otterstrom, an attorney practicing in Spokane, Washington. Bar-clays is seeking to collect on that note. Because the note contains a confession of judgment clause, this case is governed by Rule 7.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (L.R. 7.2). Local Rule 7.2 provides a method for entering and executing on judgments by confession after notice to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Berg v. Liberty Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. Rhoads v. MitchellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1946
  4. General Contract Purchase Corp. v. Max Keil Real Estate Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1933
  5. Curtice v. ScovelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1791

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barclays American/business Credit, Inc. v. Jan G. OtterstromCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API