Legal Opinion
Rhoads v. Mitchell
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided January 7, 1946No. Judgment No. 685PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The main question to be considered in this case is as to whether the instrument upon which the judgment was entered was such an instrument as would, under the laws of Delaware, authorize a judgment by confession to be entered thereon. Before considering this question, however, two antecedent questions raised by the plaintiff in the judgment in his motion to dismiss the rule must be disposed of.
1. Is the receiver the proper person to bring forward the motion to vacate the judgment against the corporation?
2. Could the motion to vacate the judgment…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Romberger v. RombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Haverford Township School District v. HerzogSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Galli's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Noonan, Inc. v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Miles v. LaytonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Architectural Cabinets, Inc. v. GasterSuperior Court of Delaware · 1971
- Cheidem Corp. v. FarmerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1982
- Eugene A. Delle Donne & Son, L.P. v. Applied Card Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Barclays American/Business Credit, Inc. v. OtterstromDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Szymanski v. HearnSuperior Court of Delaware · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.