Legal Opinion

Berg v. Liberty Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 13, 1981PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORSEY, Justice.

This appeal concerns whether a mortgage lender’s otherwise available remedies on borrower’s default are compromised by lender’s dealings with a third party grantee under a debt arrangement with borrower.

In 1970, Howard M. Berg and Sandra Berg (borrowers) executed, for valuable consideration, a bond and mortgage of real estate in favor of Liberty Federal Savings and Loan Association (lender). In 1973, borrowers sold the real estate to a third party (grantee) who assumed liability for the mortgage indebtedness. Lender was not a party to the transaction and did not execute any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davenport v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Miami Nat. Bank v. Forecast Const. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. North Western Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. EddlemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Equitable Trust Co. v. ShawCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1937
  5. Gellis v. S. Gellis & Co., Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kepler v. SladeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Royal Palm Corporate Center Ass'n v. PNC Bank, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Moening v. Alaska Mutual BankAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Belote v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. Szego v. Kingsley AnyanwutakuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API