Legal Opinion

Mark Joseph Tatum v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 17, 2023No. A23A0526Published

1Opinion of the Court

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., GOBEIL, J., and SENIOR APPELLATE JUDGE PHIPPS NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules April 17, 2023 In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A23A0526. TATUM v. THE STATE. GOBEIL, Judge. Following a bench trial, Mark Joseph Tatum was convicted of being a “peeping Tom” and invasion of privacy. On appeal, Tatum argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress/motion in limine regarding the contents of his cell…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  3. Teal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  5. O'KEEFE v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API