Legal Opinion

Town of Scranton v. Hensen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 3, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Greene District Court. — IIon. F. M. Powers, Judge. Defendants were accused of the violation of an ordinance of the plaintiff town, in that without a license they carried on a transient mercantile business in the. said town. The trial court directed a verdict for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Deemer, J. —

Section Y00 of the Code provides that “towns shall have power to define by ordinance • who shall be considered transient merchants and to regulate license and tax their sales. . . .” Pursuant to this statute the plaintiff town enacted an ordinance from which we extract the following:

Section 1. Be it ordained by the council of the in*223corporated town of Scranton, in Greene County, Iowa, that no person, firm or company or corporation shall be engaged in any manner, directly or indirectly, carry on any trade, business, profession, or scheme, hereinafter mentioned, described or defined…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Carrollton v. BazzetteIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McMath v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  3. City of Ottumwa v. ZekindSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Commonwealth v. CrowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steinberg-Baum & Co. v. Dayton CountrymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  2. State v. DahlstromSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  3. Ecklund v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  4. State v. WickettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  5. State v. LittleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API