Legal Opinion

Globe Lighting Fixture Mfg. Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 6, 1946No. C. D. 980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LawRence, Judge:

Certain imported merchandise, described on the invoice as “Brass Bayonet Type Sockets, Electric Lighting Fixtures,” was classified by the collector of customs as articles, not specially provided for, composed in chief value of copper. Duty was assessed thereon accordingly at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 397, Tariff Act of 1930; and, because copper was the most valuable component, an additional duty of 3 cents per pound was levied on the articles, pursuant to section 601 (c) (7), Revenue Act of 1932, 47 Stat. pt. 1, title IV, pp. 169,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  2. W. X. Huber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
  3. Protest 979473-G of Biddle Purchasing Co.United States Customs Court · 1939
  4. Protests 962567-G of N. Minami & Co.United States Customs Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Criterion Lamp & Shade Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API